Skip to content
SOAP · Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan

2026 SOAP note examples for therapists

What is a SOAP note?

A SOAP note is a four-part clinical progress note documenting Subjective findings (what the patient reports), Objective findings (what the clinician observes), Assessment (clinical interpretation), and Plan (next steps). It's the most widely used note format in behavioral health and is accepted by every major U.S. payer.

When to use it: Use SOAP for ongoing individual therapy sessions where clear separation between patient report, clinical observation, interpretation, and forward plan supports both clinical reasoning and insurance review. SOAP is the safest default if your payer mix or supervisor doesn't specify a format.

Blank template · PDF

SOAP note — fillable template

Printable, ready for your charts. Same structure as the samples below, blank for your session.

Download PDF

Structure

S

Subjective

Patient-reported symptoms, feelings, events since last session. First-person and self-report content.

O

Objective

Clinician-observed findings: mental status, affect, behavior, validated scale scores (PHQ-9, GAD-7).

A

Assessment

Clinical interpretation, diagnosis, progress toward treatment goals, risk status.

P

Plan

Interventions used, homework assigned, next appointment, any referrals or coordination of care.

4 sample notes

Real SOAP notes by modality

Same format, four different therapeutic frames. Each note below was drafted by Mediyn from a realistic session — PHI redacted on-device, ready to sign.

CBTCognitive Behavioral Therapy
Generalized anxiety · Session 7

S

[Patient name] reports a difficult week with three panic-like episodes triggered by upcoming work deadlines. Reports continuing the daily thought record but notes it felt 'forced' on two evenings. Sleep down to 5 hrs avg this week; pattern of 4am wake-ups returned. Denies SI/HI.

O

Patient appeared on time via secure telehealth from [Location]. Affect anxious but engaged. GAD-7 administered this session: 13 (last session 11; baseline 18). PHQ-9: 8. Coordinated thinking; no thought disorder. Identified two cognitive distortions during in-session review: catastrophizing about a deliverable, mind-reading about a manager's tone.

A

Generalized Anxiety Disorder (F41.1), moderate severity, partial response to CBT. Symptom recurrence appears tied to environmental stressor (project deadline) rather than treatment plateau. Thought record practice has slipped under stress — classic relapse vulnerability. Risk: low.

P

Continue weekly CBT. This week's intervention: scheduled worry time (15 min, 7pm daily) plus behavioral experiment around the 'manager is angry' belief. Reissued the 3-column thought record with the addition of evidence-for/evidence-against. Next session [Date]. Coordinated with prescriber [Provider] re: PRN propranolol availability.

Drafted by Mediyn AI · 47sPHI redacted on-device · SOAP format
DBTDialectical Behavior Therapy
Emotion dysregulation · Session 12

S

[Patient name] reports two crisis-level urges this week: one urge to self-harm (Tuesday, did not act) and one impulsive substance use urge (Friday, did not act). Reports using TIPP for the first urge and contacting a skills coach for the second. Diary card complete: emotions ranged 30-80; effective skills use averaged 4/7 days.

O

Patient on time, alert, no evidence of intoxication. Mood: 'tired but okay.' Diary card reviewed in detail — accurate self-monitoring evident. Walked through the chain analysis of Tuesday's self-harm urge collaboratively.

A

Borderline Personality Disorder (F60.3) with co-occurring features of substance use risk. Significant progress: two high-risk urges did not result in target behavior. Emotion regulation module mostly internalized; distress tolerance still emerging.

P

Continue weekly individual DBT + skills group. Homework: TIP skill (cold water, paced breathing, paired muscle relaxation, intense exercise) practiced once nightly regardless of urge presence. Chain analysis of Friday's substance urge to be completed before next session. Skills coach calls remain available 24/7. Next session [Date].

Drafted by Mediyn AI · 52sPHI redacted on-device · SOAP format
EMDREye Movement Desensitization & Reprocessing
PTSD · Phase 4 reprocessing · Session 9

S

[Patient name] reports one nightmare in the past week (down from 4 last week), increased calm at work, and decreased startle response to elevator doors closing. Reports the negative cognition 'I'm in danger' feels 'further away' than it did at last session. Sleep improved to 7 hrs avg.

O

Patient settled quickly into the reprocessing chair. Bilateral stimulation: tactile tappers, set 1-1. Target memory from prior session re-accessed: motor vehicle accident, [Date], intersection at [Location]. SUDS at start: 4 (last session: 7). VOC for positive cognition 'I'm safe now': 5 (target ≥6).

A

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (F43.10), chronic, in active treatment. Phase 4 reprocessing progressing; target memory desensitization on schedule. Adaptive resolution emerging — the positive cognition is gaining credibility. No dissociation observed during the set.

P

Continue Phase 4 reprocessing of the MVA target. Plan: complete this target next session, expecting SUDS to reach 0-1 and VOC to reach 7. Then move to Phase 5 (installation) and Phase 6 (body scan). Self-soothe protocol homework: container + safe place visualization nightly. Next session [Date].

Drafted by Mediyn AI · 58sPHI redacted on-device · SOAP format
IFSInternal Family Systems
Trauma + perfectionism · Session 15

S

[Patient name] reports a productive week and a clear shift: the 'inner critic' part (manager) has 'taken a step back' since last session's unburdening work. A previously-blended exile (described as 'the small one who froze') has become noticeable but less terrifying. Reports two evenings of unprompted self-compassion — 'I caught myself being kind to me.'

O

Patient appeared regulated and curious throughout. Direct access used twice; in-sight access used for the rest. The protective manager checked in but stepped back when invited. Self-energy access score: 7/10 (subjective). No dissociation. Affect stable.

A

Complex trauma adjustment, IFS conceptualization. Significant shift: the manager part appears more willing to relax its protective role. The exile becoming accessible (not yet retrieved/unburdened) is a meaningful next step — and a vulnerable one. Patient's Self capacity to lead is increasing.

P

Continue weekly IFS. Next session: hope to invite the exile to share its burden(s), with the manager's permission. Homework: journaling from Self when parts get loud, not journaling AS the parts. Self-energy practice (5-min check-in twice daily). Next session [Date].

Drafted by Mediyn AI · 49sPHI redacted on-device · SOAP format

How Mediyn writes this

Mediyn listens to the session, redacts PHI on-device, and drafts the note in the format and modality you set. You review, edit if needed, and sign. See the AI documentation workflow →

FAQ

When should I use SOAP vs. DAP?

SOAP separates patient self-report (S) from clinical observation (O); DAP combines them. Choose SOAP when the distinction matters for insurance review or supervision. DAP is faster to write and increasingly common in private practice.

Do payers require SOAP?

Most payers accept SOAP, DAP, or BIRP. A handful of Medicaid programs and some integrated-care settings explicitly require SOAP. Check your payer's documentation manual — Mediyn switches formats per payer if needed.

Can Mediyn switch SOAP into DAP mid-session?

Yes — you can change the format on the in-progress draft. The session content is reused, only the section labeling shifts. No re-recording needed.

Your evenings belong to you. Not your notes.

Join the therapists who stopped staying late for documentation and started focusing on what matters — their patients.

7-day free trial · Cancel anytime · 30-day money-back guarantee